Search by Subject
| 26-Jun-2009 08:50 PM Frank | |
| The more interviews you do with Chris Forbes the better. I love his academic, no nonsense approach. | |
| 23-Jul-2009 01:33 PM Anonymous | |
| No feedback was left by this visitor. | |
| 29-Jul-2009 02:09 AM Josh Mann | |
| Succinct, but nicely done. | |
| 01-Oct-2009 12:32 AM gen | |
| I thought he would provide some real proof. If he were debating his case, or in a court trial, he certainly would not win. He didn't really have much of a case, it was conjecture and assumption! It doesn't take much talent to assume, people do it every day.
I suspect anonymous didn't leave any feedback on 7-23 because they too were unimpressed by what he presented! |
|
| 23-Oct-2009 07:34 AM Brendan | |
| Great analysis. See John Meier's first volume of A Marginal Jew for a step-by-step breakdown. Forbes does a great job articulating the conclusion. | |
| 26-Nov-2009 11:59 AM Oliver Bedford | |
| A very clear commentary. Perhaps Chris could also have mentioned the old eastern (Syriac??) text of Josephus which I understand supports a shorter original version of the disputed text; plus a comment by one of the Alexandrian church fathers circa 200AD (Clement or Origen)to the effect that Josephus spoke of Jesus negatively, which would support a less favourable original text. | |
Comment