Greg Clarke reviews Tim Winton's lastest book: Video
Christianity on the Chopping Block: Video
Bronwen Hanna on the rescue of Jews in World War II: Article
Film: Justin Toh reviews The Painted Veil: Article
The ‘Christian Vote’: help or hindrance?
John Dickson
Introduction: Mixing Religion and Politics
He who says politics and religion do not mix understands neither one. (Mahatma Gandhi)
I am the true ‘swinging voter’. In the numerous elections of my life (beginning with the Federal election of July 1987), my personal votes have been fairly evenly split between Labor and The Liberal, or Coalition, parties. In what follows, then, I have no hidden agenda. The last thing on my mind is to influence which party you vote for.
I do, however, want to insist that people who identify themselves as Christian should vote in a way that is informed by their faith, whatever decision they finally make. While Christianity is not party political, it is political in the broader sense. At a fundamental level, faith concerns life in society—the word ‘politics’ comes from the Greek politeuō, meaning to live as a citizen. Everyone who is concerned with the life of our wider community (as every Christian must be) is ‘political’ in the larger sense of the word.
In essence, what I want to do in this short article is outline how some basic Christian beliefs should – and should not – influence a Christian’s vote. I write with a dual audience in mind. I want to encourage Christians to be more thoughtful about their political opinions and I hope to demonstrate for the religious ‘spectator’ that, despite some rather potent counter-examples in North America, the ‘Christian vote’ is a vote for the good of the nation not an attempt to impose religious law on a secular society.
I begin with how a Christian ought not to vote.
A) How Not to Vote
1. Precedent: ‘how we always vote’
Voting patterns are sometimes based on little more than family heritage
(‘We have always voted for x’) or geographical location (‘Most people
vote for y where I live’). I want to suggest that voting by personal or
demographic precedent is not a thoughtful or Christian vote. Something
as important as the way, and by whom, we are governed must be
approached with seriousness and due reflection. Christians must also
resist the temptation, born of cynicism, to disengage from their
responsibilities as voters and citizens.
voting for a candidate simply because s/he is a Christian is morally suspect
2. Christian favouritism
Secondly, and perhaps a little controversially, I wish to propose that voting for a candidate simply because s/he is a Christian is morally suspect; it is simply a religious form of favouritism. Having Christians in parliament is no guarantee—or even indicator—that our nation will be marked by peace, justice, compassion, truth and so on. Sadly, history is littered with counter-examples.
By all means, a Christian may vote for Christian candidates who also have a track record for diligence, leadership and justice, but it would be irresponsible to favour men and women simply because they are known as ‘Christians’, attend churches or frequent prayer breakfasts and the like. Theologically speaking, good government is not the special preserve of believers. Chapter 13 of Paul’s epistle to the Romans makes clear that even the pagan governments of Rome were to be thought of as ‘established by God.’ Indeed, secular, non-Christian rulers are described by the apostle as ‘God’s servants.’ The point deserves deep reflection in the current climate, as the so-called ‘religious vote’ becomes an increasingly hot topic of discussion in Australia and overseas.
3. Economic prosperity
Thirdly, the main parties and most of the major media tend to make ‘economic prosperity’ a central election issue. This is a window into the soul of a country. However, Christians must seriously question a fixation with the ‘bottom line’. In a society such as ours, one without deep faith, economic prosperity may be the only measurable form of success, but the follower of Christ ought to think otherwise.
Naturally, if one sincerely believes that national prosperity happens also to be the best way to achieve other, more important, goals for society, then the Christian will appropriately vote with this in mind. However, the believer should always remember the way the pursuit of wealth is given very short shrift in the Bible:
For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs (1 Timothy 6:10).
If precedent, favouritism and prosperity are faulty grounds upon which to base the Christian vote, what factors should inform such political choices?
Page 2